Skip to content
Agent Month

MCP Server Builds for Internal Tooling

Last verified: June 2026· engagement

We expose your internal systems — Datadog, Linear, databases, deploy tooling — to AI agents over MCP, so your devs can work against company infra safely.

Outcome
Internal MCP servers with auth, access control, audit logs
Timeline
3–6 weeks
Pricing
$25–75k per build, $3–8k/mo maintenance
Buyer
Head of Platform, Head of DevEx
MCP Server Builds for Internal Tooling
ImageFiber Optical CablebychaitawatCC0 1.0tinted

The problem

Your devs want to use agents against company infra — Datadog, Linear, internal databases, deploy systems — but there’s no safe, audited way to expose those systems.

What we do

  • Build MCP servers for your internal systems with scoped access control.
  • Add authentication, authorization, and full audit logging.
  • Package them so any agent (Claude, Cursor) can use them safely.
  • Document and hand off, with maintenance available if you want it.

How it fits together

Agent
Claude · Cursor
MCP server
auth · scope · audit
Your systems
DB · Linear · deploy
Agents reach your internal systems only through a least-privilege MCP server with authentication and a full audit log.

What you get

01A suite of internal MCP servers
02Auth, access control, and audit logs built in
03Integration with your existing agent tooling
04Optional ongoing maintenance

Built on our open source

ormai — Gives AI agents database access without the risk — scoped, governed access for agents.

View on GitHub →

Common questions about this engagement

Do you work under NDA?

Yes — we sign your mutual NDA before any data or repo access. For audits we prefer read-only access to start; for builds we work in a clean repo under your ownership.

Will we own what you ship?

Always. You own the code, the runbooks, the dashboards. We are explicitly set up to hand off and transition out, not to create dependency.

Vendor-agnostic — what does that mean in practice?

We integrate with what you already run — OpenAI, Anthropic, open-weight models on your cloud, your CI/CD, your observability stack. If a hosted vendor solves it, we will not reinvent it; if a self-hosted tool is the right answer, we will not pretend the hosted one is.

How is this different from a Big Four consulting deck?

We are the engineers doing the work, not analysts handing recommendations to a different team. The deliverable is working software in your repo, not a slide deck.

Can you work with our in-house AI team instead of replacing them?

Yes — most of our engagements pair with an internal owner and ramp them up to run the system after we leave. Many of our best engagements start with "we hired an AI team, help us get them productive."

Let’s scope it on a call

Thirty minutes with an engineer. We’ll tell you straight whether this is the right first move for your team.