Skip to content
Agent Month

LLM Cost & Performance Optimization

Last verified: June 2026· engagement

Most teams running production AI pay 3–10x what they should. We audit prompts, model routing, caching, batching, and fallback chains, then ship cost-aware routing and observability.

Outcome
30–60% LLM cost reduction in 4 weeks, documented
Timeline
4–6 weeks
Pricing
$15–40k, or outcome-priced (25% of first-year savings)
Buyer
CTO, VP Eng, Head of Infra
LLM Cost & Performance Optimization
ImageAccounting FinancebyWilfred IvenCC0 1.0tinted
MONTHLY LLM SPENDunoptimised−30–60%routed · cached · batched

The problem

You shipped AI features and the bill kept climbing. Nobody can say which prompts, models, or call patterns are driving spend — so every proposed cut is a guess, and latency complaints pile up on top.

What we do

  • Instrument every LLM call: tokens, latency, cost, and quality, per route.
  • Right-size models per task and add cost-aware routing with quality guards.
  • Add prompt + response caching, request batching, and graceful fallback chains.
  • Wire cost and latency dashboards so the savings stay visible after we leave.

How it fits together

Your app
LLM calls
Cost-aware router
fast-litellm
Cheapest model that passes evals
cache · batch · fallback
Cost + latency dashboard
savings stay visible
Every call is instrumented, then routed to the cheapest model that still passes your quality bar — with caching and batching on top.

What you get

01A documented 30–60% cost reduction with before/after numbers
02Cost-aware routing in production (fast-litellm or your stack)
03A live cost + latency observability dashboard
04A runbook so your team can keep tuning without us

Built on our open source

fast-litellm — Rust acceleration for LiteLLM — faster connection pooling, rate limiting, and memory-intensive workloads.

View on GitHub →

Common questions about this engagement

Do you work under NDA?

Yes — we sign your mutual NDA before any data or repo access. For audits we prefer read-only access to start; for builds we work in a clean repo under your ownership.

Will we own what you ship?

Always. You own the code, the runbooks, the dashboards. We are explicitly set up to hand off and transition out, not to create dependency.

Vendor-agnostic — what does that mean in practice?

We integrate with what you already run — OpenAI, Anthropic, open-weight models on your cloud, your CI/CD, your observability stack. If a hosted vendor solves it, we will not reinvent it; if a self-hosted tool is the right answer, we will not pretend the hosted one is.

How is this different from a Big Four consulting deck?

We are the engineers doing the work, not analysts handing recommendations to a different team. The deliverable is working software in your repo, not a slide deck.

Can you work with our in-house AI team instead of replacing them?

Yes — most of our engagements pair with an internal owner and ramp them up to run the system after we leave. Many of our best engagements start with "we hired an AI team, help us get them productive."

Let’s scope it on a call

Thirty minutes with an engineer. We’ll tell you straight whether this is the right first move for your team.