Who we help
We speak your language natively
Pick the role that fits. Each page maps the engagements, proof, and reading that matter most to how you’re measured.
VP of Engineering
→AI coding tools are reshaping how your engineers work, your AI features have no evals, and your LLM bill keeps climbing. We help you get ahead of all three — with working software, not strategy decks.
CTO
→The board wants AI in the product. Your costs are unpredictable, your data may be sensitive, and your codebase wasn’t built for agents. We help you make the calls that hold up — and ship them.
Head of Platform
→Your engineers want to use agents against company infra — Datadog, Linear, databases, deploy systems. We build the safe, audited paths that let them, plus the eval and observability layers underneath.
Head of DevEx
→Adoption is happening with or without you. We help you standardize it — so juniors and seniors both get faster, and quality goes up instead of down.
Security Leaders
→Agent-generated code, prompts carrying sensitive data, and new injection surfaces are entering your repos daily. We help you put policy, scanning, and guardrails around all of it — without slowing the team down.
Not sure which fits?
Book a call. We’ll figure out the fastest, most measurable place to start for your team.
Why these pages are organised by role
The same engagement is a different purchase depending on who is buying it. A VP of Engineering weighing an AI cost audit is mostly asking whether it will disrupt the roadmap and who has to be involved. A CTO looking at the same work is asking how it fits a board narrative and what it commits the company to next. A Head of Platform is asking who operates the result. A security leader is asking what access it requires and what evidence it produces. The technical work barely changes; the questions that decide it change completely.
So these pages are written to the question rather than to the service. Each one starts from the problems that role actually owns, says which of our engagements addresses them, and is honest about which ones are not worth the disruption for that buyer. They also name the internal objection each role tends to face — the CFO conversation, the security review, the team that will say it can build this itself — because being ready for that is usually more useful than another paragraph about our methodology.
If you sit across two of these, read both; the overlap is where most real engagements start. If you are a founder or an engineering manager at a smaller company and none of the role pages fit, the services index is organised the other way round, by the work itself, and is probably the faster route.
What is consistent across all of them: the deliverable is working software in your repository rather than a recommendations deck, you own everything we ship, and we are structured to hand over and leave rather than to become permanent. Where an engagement would not clearly pay for itself for a given buyer, the role page says so — we would rather lose the deal on the call than three weeks in.